NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • 5.6x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 10.6 billion / sec
  • 5.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 144
  • 4.2x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2525 vs 811
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 203
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3274
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3274
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 9 October 2012 vs 3 September 2010
Texture fill rate 59.2 billion / sec vs 10.6 billion / sec
Pipelines 768 vs 144
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2525 vs 811
PassMark - G2D Mark 411 vs 203
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 vs 3274

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

  • Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 110 Watt
  • 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
  • 250x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
  • Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 7973
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 110 Watt
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 12379 vs 7973
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 vs 3335

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2525
811
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
411
203
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7973
12379
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3335
3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3335
3350
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2525 811
PassMark - G2D Mark 411 203
Geekbench - OpenCL 7973 12379
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3335 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3335 3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 881

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK106 GF106
Launch date 9 October 2012 3 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP) $149
Place in performance rating 876 878
Price now $169.99
Type Desktop Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 18.72

Technical info

Core clock speed 928 MHz 1180 MHz
CUDA cores 768 144
Floating-point performance 1,425 gflops 339.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C
Pipelines 768 144
Texture fill rate 59.2 billion / sec 10.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 35 Watt
Transistor count 2,540 million 1,170 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini... No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 6-pin
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.3 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 86.4 GB / s 60.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 5.4 GB/s 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI