NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
5.6x more texture fill rate: 59.2 billion / sec vs 10.6 billion / sec
5.3x more pipelines: 768 vs 144
4.2x better floating-point performance: 1,425 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2528 vs 811
2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 411 vs 203
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 vs 3274
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 vs 3274

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	9 October 2012 vs 3 September 2010
Texture fill rate	59.2 billion / sec vs 10.6 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 144
Floating-point performance	1,425 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm vs 40 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2528 vs 811
PassMark - G2D Mark	411 vs 203
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 vs 3274
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 vs 3274

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
3.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 110 Watt
3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
250x more memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12379 vs 7979

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1180 MHz vs 928 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	35 Watt vs 110 Watt
Maximum memory size	3 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	12379 vs 7979
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3350 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3350 vs 3335

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2528

811

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

411

203

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7979

12379

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

3274

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3335

3350

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3707

3274

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3335

3350

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
PassMark - G3D Mark	2528	811
PassMark - G2D Mark	411	203
Geekbench - OpenCL	7979	12379
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707	3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335	3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707	3274
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3335	3350
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	881

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK106	GF106
Launch date	9 October 2012	3 September 2010
Launch price (MSRP)	$149
Place in performance rating	878	880
Price now	$169.99
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Value for money (0-100)	18.72
Technical info
Core clock speed	928 MHz	1180 MHz
CUDA cores	768	144
Floating-point performance	1,425 gflops	339.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C
Pipelines	768	144
Texture fill rate	59.2 billion / sec	10.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	35 Watt
Transistor count	2,540 million	1,170 million
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI	Internal
Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...	No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12 API
OpenGL	4.3	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB / s	60.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	1250 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11		DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI