NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 400 MHz
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 10.6 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 9x more pipelines: 144 vs 16
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 110 nm
- 12x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 7.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 811 vs 115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 vs 3 March 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion / sec vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 144 vs 16 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 vs 115 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 209 vs 203
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 vs 203 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 | 115 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12379 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 7800 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Curie |
| Code name | GF106 | G70 |
| Launch date | 3 September 2010 | 3 March 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 867 | 869 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
| Floating-point performance | 339.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 110 nm |
| Pipelines | 144 | 16 |
| Texture fill rate | 10.6 billion / sec | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 302 million |
| Boost clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 60.0 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 550 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||

