AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 10.3x more texture fill rate: 108.8 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec
- 14.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 144
- 10.2x better floating-point performance: 3,482 gflops vs 339.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 5448 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7037 vs 3350
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 vs 3 September 2010 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s vs 10.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 144 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops vs 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 850 MHz
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3274 vs 2852
- 71.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3274 vs 46
- 26.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 125.7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 850 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3274 vs 2852 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3274 vs 46 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 125.7 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.778 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1285.141 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.839 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.347 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 321.767 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2852 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 46 | 3274 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7037 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 125.7 | 3350 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 811 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 203 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12379 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | Amethyst | GF106 |
| Launch date | 23 November 2014 | 3 September 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 864 | 867 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,482 gflops | 339.8 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 144 |
| Texture fill rate | 108.8 GTexel / s | 10.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,170 million |
| CUDA cores | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 174.3 GB / s | 60.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5448 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition with others
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 445M
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4000
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon R9 M380
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
AMDRadeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
