NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
- Around 87% better floating-point performance: 167.8 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 351 vs 172
- 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 32
- 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 vs 0.612
- Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 84.603 vs 56.838
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 29 July 2008 |
Pipelines | 48 vs 32 |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops vs 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 351 vs 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 vs 32 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 vs 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 vs 56.838 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 874 MHz
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1187
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1187
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 874 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1505 vs 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1505 vs 1187 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 351 | 172 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 163 | 32 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1367 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 | 0.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 | 56.838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1187 | 1505 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 677 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1187 | 1505 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G96C |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 29 July 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1591 | 1666 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $85.99 | |
Price now | $85.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.13 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 874 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | 89.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 32 |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | 8.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 32 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 6.875" (17.5 cm) |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 / 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2) |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI |