NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 48 vs 32
  • Around 87% better floating-point performance: 167.8 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
  • 2.1x more memory clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 351 vs 172
  • 5.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 163 vs 32
  • 5.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 vs 0.612
  • Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 84.603 vs 56.838
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 March 2014 vs 29 July 2008
Pipelines 48 vs 32
Floating-point performance 167.8 gflops vs 89.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt vs 50 Watt
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 256 / 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1650 MHz vs 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 351 vs 172
PassMark - G2D Mark 163 vs 32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.15 vs 0.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 84.603 vs 56.838

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 874 MHz
  • Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1505 vs 1187
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1505 vs 1187
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1400 MHz vs 874 MHz
Texture fill rate 8.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1505 vs 1187
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1505 vs 1187

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
351
172
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
163
32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3.15
0.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
84.603
56.838
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1187
1505
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1187
1505
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 351 172
PassMark - G2D Mark 163 32
Geekbench - OpenCL 1367
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 3.15 0.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 84.603 56.838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 10.608
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1187 1505
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 513
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 677
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1187 1505

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla
Code name GF119 G96C
Launch date 27 March 2014 29 July 2008
Place in performance rating 1591 1666
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $85.99
Price now $85.99
Value for money (0-100) 4.13

Technical info

Core clock speed 874 MHz 1400 MHz
Floating-point performance 167.8 gflops 89.6 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 48 32
Texture fill rate 6.992 GTexel / s 8.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 29 Watt 50 Watt
Transistor count 292 million 314 million
CUDA cores 32
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 145 mm 6.875" (17.5 cm)
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 / 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 13.2 GB / s 25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)
Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1650 MHz 800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3

Technologies

CUDA
SLI