NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 96 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 83% higher memory clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 162 vs 44
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 3.15 vs 0.465
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 677 vs 127
- 5.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 677 vs 127
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 21 February 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 96 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 vs 44 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 vs 0.465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 677 vs 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 677 vs 127 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
- Around 86% higher core clock speed: 1625 MHz vs 874 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 20.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 64 vs 48
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 208 gflops vs 167.8 gflops
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 477 vs 347
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3161 vs 1187
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3161 vs 1187
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1625 MHz vs 874 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 20.8 billion / sec vs 6.992 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 64 vs 48 |
Floating-point performance | 208 gflops vs 167.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 477 vs 347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3161 vs 1187 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3161 vs 1187 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 347 | 477 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 162 | 44 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1361 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.15 | 0.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 84.603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.294 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.608 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 677 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1187 | 3161 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 513 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 677 | 127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1187 | 3161 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 705 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GF119 | G94 |
Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 21 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1581 | 1591 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $39.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 23.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 874 MHz | 1625 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 167.8 gflops | 208 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 64 |
Texture fill rate | 6.992 GTexel / s | 20.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt | 96 Watt |
Transistor count | 292 million | 505 million |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 9" (22.9 cm) |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 13.2 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1650 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |