NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs NVIDIA NVS 510

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2609 vs 1677
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 vs 6.809
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 146.913 vs 111.269
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.587 vs 0.399
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.121 vs 3.385
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 vs 9.522
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 976
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 vs 1720
• 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 976
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 1720

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510

• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 775 MHz
• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 12.75 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
• Around 28% better floating-point performance: 306.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 1782 MHz vs 1600 MHz
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 701 vs 462
• 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 290 vs 119
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1211 vs 1047
• Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1211 vs 1047

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	462 701
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	119 290
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2609 1677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.901 6.809
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	146.913 111.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.587 0.399
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.121 3.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.755 9.522
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2570 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2035 1720
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1047 1211
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2570 976
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2035 1720

Compare specifications (specs)