NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M vs AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M and AMD Radeon HD 7570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • Around 55% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 500 MHz
  • Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 938 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 12.4 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 459 vs 427
  • 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2610 vs 1085
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.901 vs 3.109
  • Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.587 vs 0.333
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1047 vs 905
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 1797
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1047 vs 905
  • Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 1797
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 April 2013 vs 7 January 2012
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 500 MHz
Boost clock speed 938 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s vs 12 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 459 vs 427
Geekbench - OpenCL 2610 vs 1085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.901 vs 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.587 vs 0.333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 vs 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2570 vs 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 vs 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2570 vs 1797

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7570M

  • 4.2x more pipelines: 400 vs 96
  • 2x better floating-point performance: 480.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • 2x more memory clock speed: 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 190 vs 119
  • Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 199.164 vs 146.913
  • Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.489 vs 10.121
  • Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.722 vs 22.755
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2352 vs 2035
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2352 vs 2035
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 400 vs 96
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 13 Watt vs 33 Watt
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 190 vs 119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 199.164 vs 146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.489 vs 10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 42.722 vs 22.755
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2352 vs 2035
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2352 vs 2035

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7570M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
459
427
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
119
190
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2610
1085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.901
3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
146.913
199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.587
0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.121
10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
22.755
42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2570
1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2035
2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047
905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2570
1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2035
2352
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M AMD Radeon HD 7570M
PassMark - G3D Mark 459 427
PassMark - G2D Mark 119 190
Geekbench - OpenCL 2610 1085
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 6.901 3.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 146.913 199.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.587 0.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.121 10.489
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.755 42.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1047 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2570 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2035 2352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1047 905
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2570 1797
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2035 2352

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M AMD Radeon HD 7570M

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 TeraScale 2
Code name GF117 Thames
Launch date 1 April 2013 7 January 2012
Place in performance rating 1443 1446
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 938 MHz 650 MHz
Core clock speed 775 MHz 500 MHz
Floating-point performance 240.0 gflops 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 400
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 12 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 13 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 716 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized

API support

DirectX 12 API 11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 12.8 GB / s 25.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 3200 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5 / DDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus