NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1086 vs 462
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 119
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2914 vs 2609
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 6.901
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 146.913
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.587
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 10.121
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1047
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1047
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1086 vs 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2914 vs 2609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 vs 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 vs 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 vs 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 vs 10.121 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 1047 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 vs 16.3
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 861
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 vs 1443
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 861
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 1443
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 vs 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 vs 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1086 | 462 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 | 119 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2914 | 2609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 6.901 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 146.913 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.587 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 10.121 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 22.755 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2035 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 1047 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 2570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2035 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GK107 | GF117 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1435 | 1437 |
| Price now | $79 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
| Boost clock speed | 938 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K1100M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIANVS 510
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 720M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400E
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M230
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810M
NVIDIAQuadro K1100M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M360
