NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
- 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 460
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 119
- Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 2602
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 6.901
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 146.913
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.587
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 10.121
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1047
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1047
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 vs 460 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 vs 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 vs 2602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 vs 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 vs 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 vs 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 vs 10.121 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 vs 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 vs 1047 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 706 MHz
- Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 vs 16.3
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 861
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 vs 1443
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 861
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 1443
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz vs 706 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.755 vs 16.3 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2570 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2035 vs 1443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2570 vs 861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2035 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1090 | 460 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 254 | 119 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3025 | 2602 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.649 | 6.901 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 174.555 | 146.913 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.642 | 0.587 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.732 | 10.121 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.3 | 22.755 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1892 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 861 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1443 | 2035 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1892 | 1047 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 861 | 2570 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1443 | 2035 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | GK107 | GF117 |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109.94 | |
Place in performance rating | 1442 | 1444 |
Price now | $79 | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.59 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 706 MHz | 775 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 542.2 gflops | 240.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 22.59 GTexel / s | 12.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 585 million |
Boost clock speed | 938 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 2560x1600 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 44.8 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder |