NVIDIA Quadro K1100M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 82% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • 4x more pipelines: 384 vs 96
  • 2.3x better floating-point performance: 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
  • Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1090 vs 460
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 254 vs 119
  • Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3025 vs 2602
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.649 vs 6.901
  • Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 174.555 vs 146.913
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.642 vs 0.587
  • Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.732 vs 10.121
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1892 vs 1047
  • Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 1047
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2013
Texture fill rate 22.59 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 96
Floating-point performance 542.2 gflops vs 240.0 gflops
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1090 vs 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 254 vs 119
Geekbench - OpenCL 3025 vs 2602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.649 vs 6.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 174.555 vs 146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.642 vs 0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.732 vs 10.121
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1892 vs 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1892 vs 1047

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 706 MHz
  • Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
  • Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.755 vs 16.3
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2570 vs 861
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2035 vs 1443
  • 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2570 vs 861
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2035 vs 1443
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 706 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt vs 45 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 22.755 vs 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2570 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2035 vs 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2570 vs 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2035 vs 1443

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1090
460
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
254
119
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3025
2602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.649
6.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
174.555
146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.642
0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11.732
10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
16.3
22.755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1892
1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
861
2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1443
2035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1892
1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
861
2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1443
2035
Name NVIDIA Quadro K1100M NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1090 460
PassMark - G2D Mark 254 119
Geekbench - OpenCL 3025 2602
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 8.649 6.901
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 174.555 146.913
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.642 0.587
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.732 10.121
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 16.3 22.755
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1892 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 861 2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1443 2035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1892 1047
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 861 2570
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1443 2035
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro K1100M NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi 2.0
Code name GK107 GF117
Launch date 23 July 2013 1 April 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $109.94
Place in performance rating 1442 1444
Price now $79
Type Mobile workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 17.59

Technical info

Core clock speed 706 MHz 775 MHz
Floating-point performance 542.2 gflops 240.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 96
Texture fill rate 22.59 GTexel / s 12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 33 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 585 million
Boost clock speed 938 MHz

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 2560x1600
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 2560x1600
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 2.0

API support

DirectX 12 12 API
OpenGL 4.5 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 44.8 GB / s 12.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 2800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 DDR3
Shared memory 0 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder