NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 14.43 GTexel / s vs 11.5 GTexel / s
- Around 25% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 836 vs 815
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 250 vs 174
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2908 vs 2797
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.872 vs 7.814
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 166.832 vs 162.583
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.817 vs 0.798
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.415 vs 11.854
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 36.916 vs 30.631
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1654
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1654
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 vs 6 March 2014 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s vs 11.5 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 vs 815 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 vs 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2908 vs 2797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 vs 7.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 vs 162.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 vs 0.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 vs 11.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 vs 30.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1654 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 719 MHz vs 700 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 49 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2370 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3324
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2370 vs 1693
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3324
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 719 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2370 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2370 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3324 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 836 | 815 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 250 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2908 | 2797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | 7.814 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | 162.583 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | 0.798 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | 11.854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | 30.631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 | 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 | 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 | 1654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 | 2370 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GF108 | GK208 |
Launch date | 18 June 2014 | 6 March 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 1318 | 1319 |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 719 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | 11.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt | 33 Watt |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,270 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
TXAA |