NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher texture fill rate: 26.78 GTexel / s vs 22.7 billion / sec
  • Around 18% better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1238 vs 932
  • Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 305 vs 161
  • 7.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19809 vs 2659
  • Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.446 vs 8.493
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.883 vs 0.863
  • Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 25.74 vs 19.116
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 26 August 2013 vs 1 October 2012
Texture fill rate 26.78 GTexel / s vs 22.7 billion / sec
Floating-point performance 642.8 gflops vs 544.5 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1238 vs 932
PassMark - G2D Mark 305 vs 161
Geekbench - OpenCL 19809 vs 2659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.446 vs 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.883 vs 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 25.74 vs 19.116

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

  • Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 285.42 vs 278.161
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 17.242 vs 14.778
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 32 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 285.42 vs 278.161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 17.242 vs 14.778

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1238
932
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
305
161
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
19809
2659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
12.446
8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
278.161
285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.883
0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14.778
17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
25.74
19.116
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
PassMark - G3D Mark 1238 932
PassMark - G2D Mark 305 161
Geekbench - OpenCL 19809 2659
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 12.446 8.493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 278.161 285.42
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.883 0.863
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 14.778 17.242
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 25.74 19.116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1913
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3670
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3341

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 745A NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Kepler
Code name GK107 GK107
Launch date 26 August 2013 1 October 2012
Place in performance rating 1211 1214
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Core clock speed 837 MHz
Floating-point performance 642.8 gflops 544.5 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 384
Texture fill rate 26.78 GTexel / s 22.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 33 Watt 32 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,270 million
CUDA cores 384

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3 DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus