NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 and ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 387.1 gflops vs 384.0 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 595 vs 208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 March 2009 vs 10 September 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops vs 384.0 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 595 vs 208 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
- 2.5x more pipelines: 320 vs 128
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 48 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 156 vs 56
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 320 vs 128 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 48 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 156 vs 56 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 595 | 208 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 56 | 156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | TeraScale |
Code name | G92B | RV730 |
Launch date | 4 March 2009 | 10 September 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1048 | 1049 |
Price now | $114.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 600 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 128 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | 19.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |