NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 and ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 6.8x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 6.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
Launch date | 4 March 2009 vs 25 October 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 6.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 66 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 591 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 54 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | ATI Radeon X1950 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | R500 |
Code name | G92B | RV570 |
Launch date | 4 March 2009 | 25 October 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1021 | not rated |
Price now | $114.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 575 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | 6.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 66 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 330 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 2x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 44.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1380 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |