NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 and NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 3.3x more core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 550 MHz
- 10.7x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 128 vs 16
- 8.6x better floating-point performance: 387.1 gflops vs 44.8 gflops
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 38% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 4 March 2009 vs 27 August 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec vs 4.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops vs 44.8 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 591 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 54 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3108 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Tesla |
Code name | G92B | G96C |
Launch date | 4 March 2009 | 27 August 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Place in performance rating | 1021 | not rated |
Price now | $114.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.91 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1836 MHz | 550 MHz |
CUDA cores | 128 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | 44.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Pipelines | 128 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 47.2 billion / sec | 4.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 754 million | 314 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
Length | 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) | 168 mm |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.0 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |