NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 719 MHz
- 4.7x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- 3.9x better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 552.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5356 vs 743
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1711
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1436
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1711
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 1 July 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 719 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s vs 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops vs 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5356 vs 743 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 vs 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1711 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 33 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 69% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 714 vs 423
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 714 vs 423 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5356 | 743 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 423 | 714 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 1436 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1711 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GK208 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 1 July 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 518 | 519 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 552.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 14.38 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1300 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 205 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 270
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 730A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
