NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Sky 500

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon Sky 500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 950 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 46% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4800 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5357 vs 4709
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 1096.68
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 5.352
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 247.642
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 3585
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 2116
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 3585
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 2116

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Sky 500

• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 76 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 2,432 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 422
• 3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74902 vs 19807
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.669 vs 54.188
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 89.633 vs 82.067
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5116 vs 3358
• Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5116 vs 3358

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Sky 500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5357 4709
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	422 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19807 74902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 54.669
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 1096.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 5.352
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 89.633
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 247.642
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 5116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 3585
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 2116
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 5116

Compare specifications (specs)