NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon E9550 MXM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1120 MHz
  • Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1266 MHz
  • Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
  • Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6622
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3208
  • Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6622
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3208
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 January 2018 vs 27 September 2016
Core clock speed 1152 MHz vs 1120 MHz
Boost clock speed 1417 MHz vs 1266 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8059 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8059 vs 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3208

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

  • 2.7x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
  • 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
  • 2.7x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36624 vs 19807
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 54.188
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.586 vs 1159.046
  • Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.473 vs 5.507
  • Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 96.618 vs 82.067
  • Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 507.291 vs 293.638
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3597 vs 3579
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3597 vs 3579
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 182.3 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 768
Floating-point performance 5,834 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36624 vs 19807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 112.64 vs 54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1474.586 vs 1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 9.473 vs 5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 96.618 vs 82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 507.291 vs 293.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3597 vs 3579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3597 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
19807
36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
54.188
112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1159.046
1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.507
9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
82.067
96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
293.638
507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3579
3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8059
6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3579
3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3358
3208
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
PassMark - G3D Mark 5357
PassMark - G2D Mark 422
Geekbench - OpenCL 19807 36624
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 54.188 112.64
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1159.046 1474.586
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.507 9.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 82.067 96.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 293.638 507.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8059 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3579 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 3208
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8059 6622
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3579 3597
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 3208
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2219

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 4.0
Code name GP107 Ellesmere
Launch date 3 January 2018 27 September 2016
Place in performance rating 519 516
Type Laptop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1417 MHz 1266 MHz
Core clock speed 1152 MHz 1120 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,177 gflops 5,834 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 14 nm
Pipelines 768 2304
Texture fill rate 68.02 GTexel / s 182.3 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 95 Watt
Transistor count 3,300 million 5,700 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Laptop size medium sized
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 5000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready