NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon E9550 MXM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 1120 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1266 MHz
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6622
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3208
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6622
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 27 September 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 1120 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1266 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 6622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 6622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3208 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
- 2.7x more texture fill rate: 182.3 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 5,834 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36624 vs 19807
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 112.64 vs 54.188
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1474.586 vs 1159.046
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.473 vs 5.507
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 96.618 vs 82.067
- Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 507.291 vs 293.638
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3597 vs 3579
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3597 vs 3579
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 182.3 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 5,834 gflops vs 2,177 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 36624 vs 19807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 112.64 vs 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1474.586 vs 1159.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.473 vs 5.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 96.618 vs 82.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 507.291 vs 293.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3597 vs 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3597 vs 3579 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5357 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 422 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 19807 | 36624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | 112.64 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | 1474.586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | 9.473 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | 96.618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | 507.291 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 6622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 3597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3208 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 6622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 3597 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3208 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | AMD Radeon E9550 MXM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 27 September 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 519 | 516 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 1120 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 5,834 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 182.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |