NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Xbox One S GPU
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Xbox One S GPU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 914 MHz
- Around 77% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 43.87 GTexel / s
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,404 gflops
- Around 27% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2132 MHz
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 2 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 914 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 43.87 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 1,404 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2132 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Xbox One S GPU
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Xbox One S GPU
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Xbox One S GPU |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Xbox One S GPU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Durango 2 |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 2 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 533 | not rated |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 914 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 1,404 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 43.87 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 95 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | N / A |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 68.22 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 2132 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |