NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 93% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 773 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 18372
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 65.548
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 732.046
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 17.725
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 217.357
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6291
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6291
• 3.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

• Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 80.39 GTexel / s vs 77.76 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
• Around 3% better floating-point performance: 2,573 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6680 vs 5918
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 673 vs 323
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.453 vs 5.071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5918 6680
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 673
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 18372
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 217.357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3332
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3332
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 680

Compare specifications (specs)