NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- 803.1x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs
- Around 21% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9789 vs 7975
- Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 724
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 111.543
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 9983
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 2443
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 1674
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 9983
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 2443
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 4.9 TFLOPs |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9789 vs 7975 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 vs 724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 vs 111.543 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 154.4 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1152
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33752 vs 32379
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1817.005 vs 1325.07
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 9.511 vs 8.057
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 99.875 vs 31.946
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 511.362 vs 425.709
- 5.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 839 vs 157
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1152 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33752 vs 32379 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1817.005 vs 1325.07 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.511 vs 8.057 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 99.875 vs 31.946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 511.362 vs 425.709 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 839 vs 157 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9789 | 7975 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | 724 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32379 | 33752 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10566 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3338 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10566 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3338 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 157 | 839 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP106 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 18 August 2016 | 4 August 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | $179 |
Place in performance rating | 391 | 395 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 926 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 4.9 TFLOPs |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 123.0 GTexel / s | 154.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 32 | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | 211 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |