NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1325.07
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 31.946
• 19x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2958 vs 156

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 123.0 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 768
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
• Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9796 vs 6957
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 772 vs 630
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32384 vs 22896
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 113.416
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 6.736
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 417.823
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3338 vs 3316
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 10251
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3338 vs 3316

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6957 9796
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	630 772
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	22896 32384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	113.416 115.073
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1414.794 1325.07
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.736 8.057
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	81.206 31.946
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	417.823 425.709
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3338
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10251 10566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3681 3697
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3316 3338
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2958 156

Compare specifications (specs)