AMD Radeon Pro 575X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro 575X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 575X
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 1140.7x more texture fill rate: 140.3 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1152
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35017 vs 32384
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11237 vs 10566
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11237 vs 10566
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3338
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3338
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 vs 18 August 2016 |
| Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s vs 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1152 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 vs 32384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 vs 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3338 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3458
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3458
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 575X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35017 | 32384 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11237 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11237 | 10566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3458 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3458 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3338 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3338 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9796 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 772 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 115.073 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1325.07 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.057 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.946 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 425.709 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 156 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro 575X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Polaris 20 | GP106 |
| Launch date | 18 March 2019 | 18 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 391 | 388 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 280.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.489 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1152 |
| Pixel fill rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 123.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5700 million | 4,400 million |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 217.6 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro 575X with others
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
ATIFireGL V8600
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780 Ti
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
AMDFirePro W8100
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
AMDRadeon RX 470 (Desktop)
AMDRadeon Pro 575X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
