NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 915 MHz
- Around 74% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s
- Around 66% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,634 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9094 vs 5427
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10818 vs 8276
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10818 vs 8276
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 December 2017 vs 25 August 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9094 vs 5427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 vs 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3354 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
- Around 5% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 1280
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 694 vs 616
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3627 vs 3417
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3627 vs 3417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 1280 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 694 vs 616 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3627 vs 3417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3627 vs 3417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9094 | 5427 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 616 | 694 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35303 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3417 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 | 8276 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3417 | 3627 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Code name | GP106 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 26 December 2017 | 25 August 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 312 | 314 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1344 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 109.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | 241 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB / s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
ATIFireMV 2260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 1024SP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAP102-100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
