NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 873.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9335 vs 9076
- Around 47% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 905 vs 614
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3417
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 26 December 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9335 vs 9076 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 vs 614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 vs 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 vs 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3417 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35276 vs 32447
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1676
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1676
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3911 vs 3404
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35276 vs 32447 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3911 vs 3404 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9335 | 9076 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 905 | 614 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32447 | 35276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 3911 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP106 | GP106 |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 26 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 319 | 317 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 4400 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | 250 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 160.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 160 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz |