NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD Radeon E6465
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD Radeon E6465 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 27.8x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 8x more pipelines: 1280 vs 160
- 22.3x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 192.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.5x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 3200 MHz
- 35.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 231
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 354
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 29 September 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 160 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 192.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 3200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 354 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon E6465
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 120 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon E6465
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon E6465 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 | 231 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31098 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD Radeon E6465 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | GP106B | Caicos |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 29 September 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
| Place in performance rating | 385 | 474 |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 192.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 160 |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 370 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
