NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 635 vs 444
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 113.416 vs 111.55
  • Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.794 vs 1371.266
  • 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 81.206 vs 19.803
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3681 vs 3654
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3681 vs 3654
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 6 February 2017 vs 15 August 2016
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 635 vs 444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416 vs 111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794 vs 1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206 vs 19.803
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3681 vs 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3681 vs 3654

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

  • Around 40% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1076 MHz
  • Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1480 MHz
  • Around 41% higher texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
  • Around 41% better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
  • Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
  • Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
  • Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 6927
  • Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30868 vs 22889
  • Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 6.736
  • Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 417.823
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 10251
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3316
  • Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 10251
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3316
  • Around 24% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3671 vs 2958
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 1076 MHz
Boost clock speed 1708 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate 133.6 GTexel / s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1280 vs 768
Floating-point performance 4,275 gflops vs 3,031 gflops
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 5 GB
Memory clock speed 8008 MHz vs 7008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8161 vs 6927
Geekbench - OpenCL 30868 vs 22889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.49 vs 6.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 509.222 vs 417.823
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12645 vs 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12645 vs 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3316
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3671 vs 2958

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6927
8161
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
635
444
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
22889
30868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
113.416
111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1414.794
1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6.736
8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
81.206
19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
417.823
509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10251
12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3681
3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3316
3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10251
12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3681
3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3316
3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2958
3671
Name NVIDIA Quadro P2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 6927 8161
PassMark - G2D Mark 635 444
Geekbench - OpenCL 22889 30868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 113.416 111.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1414.794 1371.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.736 8.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 81.206 19.803
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 417.823 509.222
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10251 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3681 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3316 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10251 12645
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3681 3654
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3316 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2958 3671

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Pascal
Code name GP106 GP106B
Launch date 6 February 2017 15 August 2016
Launch price (MSRP) $585 $237.11
Place in performance rating 403 406
Price now $429.99 $229.99
Type Workstation Laptop
Value for money (0-100) 19.44 49.49

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1480 MHz 1708 MHz
Core clock speed 1076 MHz 1506 MHz
Floating-point performance 3,031 gflops 4,275 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 16 nm
Pipelines 768 1280
Texture fill rate 94.72 GTexel / s 133.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 120 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 4,400 million
CUDA cores 1280
Maximum GPU temperature 94 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 4x DisplayPort DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 201 mm
Supplementary power connectors None
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 140.2 GB / s 192 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 8008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GPU Boost
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
ShadowWorks
Surround
Virtual Reality
VR Ready