NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1740 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1379 MHz
- 323.6x more texture fill rate: 57.12 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 654 vs 437
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 vs 27 June 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 1740 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1379 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s vs 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 vs 437 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9884 vs 4978
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 37928 vs 24944
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9884 vs 4978 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 37928 vs 24944 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 654 | 437 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4978 | 9884 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 24944 | 37928 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 214.123 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2293.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.704 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 139.717 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 692.9 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8048 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14915 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8902 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8048 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4887 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 28 Jun 2022 | 27 June 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 225 | 222 |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1379 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1740 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 57.12 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.828 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 28.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 57.12 GTexel/s | 176.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,648 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Height | 18 mm, 0.7 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Width | 69 mm, 2.7 inches | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.00 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1630 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M
