NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 889 MHz
Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39335 vs 27085
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 8721
Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 8721
Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 3095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	16 Mar 2020 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed	1035 MHz vs 889 MHz
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	39335 vs 27085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780 vs 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780 vs 8721
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172 vs 3095

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8951 vs 6442
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 334
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1982
Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 2168
Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1982

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8951 vs 6442
PassMark - G2D Mark	590 vs 334
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3679 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3679 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6442

8951

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

334

590

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

39335

27085

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

8721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9780

8721

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2168

3679

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1982

3353

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3172

3095

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G3D Mark	6442	8951
PassMark - G2D Mark	334	590
Geekbench - OpenCL	39335	27085
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9780	8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2168	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1982	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9780	8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2168	3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1982	3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3172	3095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		290.861

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q	NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	N18P-G62	GK110B
Launch date	16 Mar 2020	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	445	448
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999.99
Value for money (0-100)		10.82
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	980 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	889 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1024	2880
CUDA cores		2880
Floating-point performance		5,645 gflops
Texture fill rate		213 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)		250 Watt
Transistor count		7,080 million
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 8-pin and one 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL		4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	12000 MHz	7.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory bandwidth		336 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
Display Connectors		2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA