NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1035 MHz vs 889 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 1714.3x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39420 vs 25477
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9780 vs 8721
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9780 vs 8721
  • Around 2% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3172 vs 3095
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 vs 18 February 2014
Core clock speed 1035 MHz vs 889 MHz
Boost clock speed 1200 MHz vs 980 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 39420 vs 25477
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 vs 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 vs 8721
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 vs 3095

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

  • 2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
  • Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
  • Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9050 vs 6424
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 597 vs 334
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3679 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1982
  • Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3679 vs 2168
  • Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1982
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2880 vs 1024
Maximum memory size 6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 9050 vs 6424
PassMark - G2D Mark 597 vs 334
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3679 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 1982
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3679 vs 2168
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 1982

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6424
9050
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
334
597
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
39420
25477
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9780
8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2168
3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1982
3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3172
3095
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
PassMark - G3D Mark 6424 9050
PassMark - G2D Mark 334 597
Geekbench - OpenCL 39420 25477
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9780 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2168 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1982 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9780 8721
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2168 3679
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1982 3353
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3172 3095
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 72.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1293.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 22.384
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 290.861

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler
Code name N18P-G62 GK110B
Launch date 16 Mar 2020 18 February 2014
Place in performance rating 436 442
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999.99
Value for money (0-100) 10.82

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 980 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 889 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1024 2880
CUDA cores 2880
Floating-point performance 5,645 gflops
Texture fill rate 213 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250 Watt
Transistor count 7,080 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Supplementary power connectors One 8-pin and one 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 336 GB / s

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
TXAA