NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M470X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 M470X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 1131.8x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6160 vs 3244
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6160 vs 3244 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M470X
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 426 vs 326
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57109 vs 35607
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 426 vs 326 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57109 vs 35607 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M470X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6160 | 3244 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 426 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35607 | 57109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2950 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 M470X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU117 | Strato |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 459 | 461 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s | 61.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,971 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X700 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
