NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 434.4x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35427 vs 23391
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.441 vs 57.735
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.882 vs 5.505
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 37.407
- Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.498 vs 174.323
- Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2953 vs 2780
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35427 vs 23391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 vs 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 vs 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 vs 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 vs 174.323 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2953 vs 2780 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
- 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8009 vs 6164
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 327
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1047.138
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 8824
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 8824
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 896 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8009 vs 6164 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 1047.138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 8824 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3707 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6164 | 8009 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35427 | 23391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 129.441 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1047.138 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.882 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 78.563 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 346.498 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8824 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3707 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8824 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3707 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2953 | 2780 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 23 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 458 | 461 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Price now | $740.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.462 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.231 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 896 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 69.72 GTexel/s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 2304 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,156 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimum recommended system power | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 8-pin and one 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 6008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V7200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
ATIFireGL V5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R7 A265
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 M470X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 Max-Q
