NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 18% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 863 MHz
  • Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1245 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • 434.4x more texture fill rate: 69.72 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 56% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 36341 vs 23222
  • 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 129.465 vs 57.735
  • Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 5.505
  • 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 78.563 vs 37.407
  • Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 346.529 vs 174.323
  • Around 6% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2954 vs 2797
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 23 April 2019 vs 23 May 2013
Core clock speed 1020 MHz vs 863 MHz
Boost clock speed 1245 MHz vs 900 MHz
Texture fill rate 69.72 GTexel/s vs 160.5 billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt vs 250 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 3 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 36341 vs 23222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 129.465 vs 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88 vs 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.563 vs 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 346.529 vs 174.323
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2954 vs 2797

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

  • 2.6x more pipelines: 2304 vs 896
  • 3x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8007 vs 6169
  • Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 587 vs 326
  • Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 1047.553
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 8824
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 8824
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 2304 vs 896
Memory clock speed 6008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8007 vs 6169
PassMark - G2D Mark 587 vs 326
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1269.688 vs 1047.553
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9064 vs 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3352
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9064 vs 8824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 vs 3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3352

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6169
8007
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
326
587
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
36341
23222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
129.465
57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1047.553
1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
7.88
5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
78.563
37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
346.529
174.323
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8824
9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8824
9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3707
3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2954
2797
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark 6169 8007
PassMark - G2D Mark 326 587
Geekbench - OpenCL 36341 23222
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 129.465 57.735
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1047.553 1269.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 7.88 5.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 78.563 37.407
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 346.529 174.323
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8824 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3707 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8824 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3707 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2954 2797

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780

Essentials

Architecture Turing Kepler
Code name TU117 GK110
Launch date 23 April 2019 23 May 2013
Place in performance rating 471 468
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $649
Price now $740.99
Value for money (0-100) 12.94

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1245 MHz 900 MHz
Core clock speed 1020 MHz 863 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.72 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.462 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.231 TFLOPS
Pipelines 896 2304
Pixel fill rate 39.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.72 GTexel/s 160.5 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 7,080 million
CUDA cores 2304
Floating-point performance 4,156 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 95 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Minimum recommended system power 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors One 8-pin and one 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.3
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
PhysX
TXAA