NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 6966
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 6966
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 6293
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 6293
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 6293 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 4% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- Around 92% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 1536
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 487
- Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 vs 10201
- Around 97% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10970 vs 5572
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 16828
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 16828
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2944 vs 1536 |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 487 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 vs 10201 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10970 vs 5572 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 16828 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 16828 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 912 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10201 | 18811 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5572 | 10970 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 6966 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 25500 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 6293 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 6293 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N18E-G0 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 117 | 98 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Price now | $749.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1710 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 2944 |
| Transistor count | 6600 million | 13,600 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
NVIDIARTX A5000 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600S
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs
AppleM2 Ultra 60-core
