NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1132 MHz
- 7.1x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3713
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3713
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1132 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1590 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1536
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 487
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 10205
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 16828
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 16828
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1590 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 10205 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 16828 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | 888 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10205 | 20021 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5570 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16828 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16828 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | N18E-G0 | GV100 |
Launch date | 23 April 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 117 | 95 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | 1628 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1132 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 5120 |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 463.0 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6144 MB | 32 GB |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory bandwidth | 870.4 GB / s |