NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 75% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 650 MHz
• 12326.9x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 90 nm
• 12x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 512 MB
• 57.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8647 vs 151

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition

• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1950 CrossFire Edition

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8647 151
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 466

Compare specifications (specs)