NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 7% higher core clock speed: 1140 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1335 MHz vs 1190 MHz
1122.6x more texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8607 vs 6575
Around 93% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 27082
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 8931
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 8931
Around 69% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4929 vs 2911

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	23 April 2019 vs 1 February 2018
Core clock speed	1140 MHz vs 1063 MHz
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz vs 1190 MHz
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8607 vs 6575
Geekbench - OpenCL	52263 vs 27082
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301 vs 8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4929 vs 2911

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 363

Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	774 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

8607

6575

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

363

774

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

52263

27082

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12301

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3351

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12301

8931

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3718

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

3351

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

4929

2911

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
PassMark - G3D Mark	8607	6575
PassMark - G2D Mark	363	774
Geekbench - OpenCL	52263	27082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	195.93
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1919.95
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	14.6
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	94.964
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	492.867
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12301	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3718	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12301	8931
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3718	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	3351
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4929	2911

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q	AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 4.0
Code name	TU116	Polaris 22
Launch date	23 April 2019	1 February 2018
Place in performance rating	336	337
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1335 MHz	1190 MHz
Core clock speed	1140 MHz	1063 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	128.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	8.202 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	4.101 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1536	1536
Pixel fill rate	64.08 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	128.2 GTexel/s	114.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	6600 million
Floating-point performance		3,656 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Laptop size	medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	204.8 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Shared memory		0