AMD Radeon Pro W5500X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon Pro W5500X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1243 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 277.9 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 729 vs 362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s vs 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 vs 362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 205 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8630 vs 7351
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 205 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8630 vs 7351 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W5500X
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 729 | 362 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7351 | 8630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 52263 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4903 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon Pro W5500X | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Code name | Navi 10 | TU116 |
| Launch date | Q3'2020 | 23 April 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 328 | 329 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1335 MHz |
| Compute units | 20 | |
| Core clock speed | 1243 MHz | 1140 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 555.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 128.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.2 TFLOPS (2:1) | 8.202 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.6 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 277.9 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 205 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10300 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x Thunderbolt 3, 2x HDMI | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 12 inches (305 mm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Width | Dual-slot | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5500X with others
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIFirePro V5700
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGRID K140Q
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GH
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
