NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA ION LE
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 and NVIDIA ION LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1208 vs 98
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 450 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 vs 98 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA ION LE
- 9.1x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 182 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 96 vs 53
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 182 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 96 vs 53 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
GPU 2: NVIDIA ION LE
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | NVIDIA ION LE |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 | 98 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 | 96 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | NVIDIA ION LE | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT200 | ION |
| Launch date | 16 June 2008 | 3 June 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1396 | 1397 |
| Price now | $95.38 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 450 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | |
| Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 282 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | No outputs |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
