NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher texture fill rate: 36.9 billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 192 vs 112
- Around 42% better floating-point performance: 476.9 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- Around 75% higher maximum memory size: 896 MB vs 512 MB
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 999 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1208 vs 463
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 53 vs 49
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 June 2008 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec vs 33.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 896 MB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 vs 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1242 MHz
- Around 73% lower typical power consumption: 105 Watt vs 182 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1242 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 105 Watt vs 182 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3342 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1208 | 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 53 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19512 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.664 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 477.327 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.906 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.525 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GT200 | G92 |
| Launch date | 16 June 2008 | 29 October 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $349 |
| Place in performance rating | 1396 | 1399 |
| Price now | $95.38 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 476.9 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | 105 °C |
| Pipelines | 192 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.9 billion / sec | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 182 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | S / PDIF |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | 2048x1536 |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | 9" (22.9 cm) |
| SLI options | 2-way3-way | 2-way |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 896 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 111.9 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 448 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| SLI | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
