NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE vs ATI Radeon HD 4200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE and ATI Radeon HD 4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2.6x more core clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 500 MHz
• 7.2x more pipelines: 288 vs 40
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
• 17.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1990 vs 112
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3108 vs 485
• 6.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3108 vs 485

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4200

• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 372 vs 363

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1990 112
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	363 372
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3108 485
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3108 485

Compare specifications (specs)