NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 1024 vs 320
- 7.8x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 320.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
- 6x more maximum memory size: 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 512 MB
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 1707 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 8.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 401
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 394 vs 320
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3330 vs 3262
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3330 vs 3262
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 24 March 2011 vs 9 January 2009 |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 16 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 vs 320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 vs 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 vs 3262 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
- 10.4x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 365 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 365 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 401 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 320 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12811 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3262 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3262 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | GF110 | M96 |
Launch date | 24 March 2011 | 9 January 2009 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Place in performance rating | 773 | 776 |
Price now | $184 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 500 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 320.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec | 16 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 35 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 514 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | No outputs |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 327.7 GB / s | 19.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround | ||
1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
Powerplay |