NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 574 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 77.7 billion / sec vs 32.1 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 448
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3341 vs 2704
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12830 vs 9850
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 30.921 vs 24.377
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1116.126 vs 793.755
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.799 vs 2.66
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.114 vs 34.891
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.239 vs 90.839
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4118 vs 3501
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4118 vs 3501
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 24 March 2011 vs 10 December 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 574 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 vs 2704 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12830 vs 9850 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 vs 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 vs 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 vs 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 vs 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 vs 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 vs 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 vs 3501 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 365 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
- Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 2988 MHz vs 1707 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 394
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 365 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 2988 MHz vs 1707 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 vs 394 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3689 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 vs 3330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3689 vs 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3335 vs 3330 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3341 | 2704 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 455 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12830 | 9850 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 30.921 | 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1116.126 | 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.799 | 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.114 | 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.239 | 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4118 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3330 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4118 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3330 | 3335 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Code name | GF110 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 24 March 2011 | 10 December 2010 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $4,399 |
| Place in performance rating | 768 | 769 |
| Price now | $184 | $332.21 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.41 | 12.86 |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 574 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1024 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 1,244.2 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.7 billion / sec | 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 365 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 3x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort, Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm) | 248 mm |
| SLI options | Quad | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 327.7 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1707 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||

