NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 2.6x more boost clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 39.2x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 1.6 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 768 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 32 MB
- 139x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3335 vs 24
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 460 vs 212
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 vs 1 February 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 4 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 32 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3335 vs 24 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 vs 212 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400
- 116.7x more memory clock speed: 700 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3335 | 24 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 460 | 212 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9516 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3242 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3242 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
| Code name | GK106 | NV44 A2 |
| Launch date | 26 March 2013 | 1 February 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
| Place in performance rating | 836 | 829 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1033 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 400 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 4 |
| Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec | 1.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 134 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.2 GB / s | 5.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 350 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6.0 GB/s | 700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | 64 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| UltraShadow II | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
ATIRadeon X600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
ATIRadeon X300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6600
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
NVIDIAQuadro K510M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R5 235X OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs
AMDRadeon R7 350X OEM
