AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 134 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • 333.3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3242
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3242
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 May 2015 vs 26 March 2013
Core clock speed 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 134 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6862 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6862 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

  • 2.5x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
  • Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9566 vs 7892
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2097
  • Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2097
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3127
  • Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3127
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Floating-point performance 1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 9566 vs 7892
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3426 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3426 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3642 vs 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3642 vs 3127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7892
9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2097
3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2097
3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3127
3642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3127
3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6862
3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6862
3242
Name AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Geekbench - OpenCL 7892 9566
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2097 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2097 3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3127 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3127 3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6862 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6862 3242
PassMark - G3D Mark 3351
PassMark - G2D Mark 460
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 51.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1106

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Essentials

Architecture GCN 1.0 Kepler
Code name Oland GK106
Launch date 5 May 2015 26 March 2013
Place in performance rating 834 836
Type Desktop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $169

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 1033 MHz
Core clock speed 1000 MHz 980 MHz
Floating-point performance 806.4 gflops 1,585 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 384 768
Texture fill rate 25.2 GTexel / s 62.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt 134 Watt
Transistor count 1,040 million 2,540 million
CUDA cores 768
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None One 6-pin
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 32 GB / s 144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz 6.0 GB/s
Memory type DDR3 GDDR5

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA