AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 134 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
333.3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3242
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3242

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	5 May 2015 vs 26 March 2013
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt vs 134 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6862 vs 3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6862 vs 3242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

2.5x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9507 vs 7888
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2097
Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2097
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3127
Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3127

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	9507 vs 7888
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426 vs 2097
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642 vs 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642 vs 3127

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7888

9507

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2097

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2097

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3127

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3127

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6862

3242

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6862

3242

Name	AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Geekbench - OpenCL	7888	9507
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2097	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2097	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3127	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3127	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6862	3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6862	3242
PassMark - G3D Mark		3350
PassMark - G2D Mark		454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		51.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Essentials
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Oland	GK106
Launch date	5 May 2015	26 March 2013
Place in performance rating	829	832
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$169
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1033 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	806.4 gflops	1,585 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	768
Texture fill rate	25.2 GTexel / s	62.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	65 Watt	134 Watt
Transistor count	1,040 million	2,540 million
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	One 6-pin
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	32 GB / s	144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA