AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 134 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 333.3x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6862 vs 3242
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6862 vs 3242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 vs 26 March 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 980 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 1033 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 134 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 vs 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 vs 3242 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- 2.5x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- Around 97% better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9573 vs 7892
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 2097
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 2097
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 3127
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 3127
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 62.7 billion / sec vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 1,585 gflops vs 806.4 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9573 vs 7892 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3426 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3426 vs 2097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3642 vs 3127 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3642 vs 3127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7892 | 9573 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2097 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2097 | 3426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3127 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3127 | 3642 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6862 | 3242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6862 | 3242 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3337 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 458 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.21 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 561.43 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 51.009 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1106 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon R7 350X OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Oland | GK106 |
Launch date | 5 May 2015 | 26 March 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 833 | 835 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 980 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 806.4 gflops | 1,585 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 25.2 GTexel / s | 62.7 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 134 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,540 million |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | One 6-pin |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 32 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |