NVIDIA Quadro K510M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K510M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K510M

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
4.5x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 134 Watt
400x more memory clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Launch date	23 July 2013 vs 26 March 2013
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 134 Watt
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz vs 6.0 GB/s

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

Around 16% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 846 MHz
4.6x more texture fill rate: 62.7 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
4x more pipelines: 768 vs 192
4.9x better floating-point performance: 1,585 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
5.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3330 vs 641
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 458 vs 441
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3426 vs 1087
3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3426 vs 1087
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3642 vs 2012
Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3642 vs 2012
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3242 vs 3071
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3242 vs 3071

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	980 MHz vs 846 MHz
Texture fill rate	62.7 billion / sec vs 13.54 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 192
Floating-point performance	1,585 gflops vs 324.9 gflops
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3330 vs 641
PassMark - G2D Mark	458 vs 441
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3426 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3426 vs 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3642 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3642 vs 2012
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3242 vs 3071
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3242 vs 3071

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K510M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

641

3330

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

441

458

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1087

3426

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2012

3642

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3242

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3071

3242

Name	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
PassMark - G3D Mark	641	3330
PassMark - G2D Mark	441	458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1087	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1087	3426
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	2012	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	2012	3642
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3071	3242
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3071	3242
Geekbench - OpenCL		9507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		25.21
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		561.43
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		30.868
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		51.009
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1106

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro K510M	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Kepler
Code name	GK208	GK106
Launch date	23 July 2013	26 March 2013
Place in performance rating	835	836
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$169
Technical info
Core clock speed	846 MHz	980 MHz
Floating-point performance	324.9 gflops	1,585 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	192	768
Texture fill rate	13.54 GTexel / s	62.7 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt	134 Watt
Transistor count	1270 Million	2,540 million
Boost clock speed		1033 MHz
CUDA cores		768
Maximum GPU temperature		97 °C
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
Display Port	1.2
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	medium sized
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length		9.5" (24.1 cm)
Supplementary power connectors		One 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.3
Shader Model	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB / s	144.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2400 MHz	6.0 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA