NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1152 vs 2x 240
- Around 72% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 2x 596.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 289 Watt
- 5.6x more memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 999 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3443
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3443
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3107
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3107
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 vs 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 2x 240 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 2x 596.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 289 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 999 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3107 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1242 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 85.25 GTexel / s
- Around 17% higher maximum memory size: 1792 MB vs 1536 MB
- Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 21048 vs 11266
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz vs 823 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion / sec vs 85.25 GTexel / s |
Maximum memory size | 1792 MB vs 1536 MB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 21048 vs 11266 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11266 | 21048 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1206 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 103 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 931 | 933 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $500 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 2x 240 |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 289 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIHDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | Quad | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1792 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | 223.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
SLI |