NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 675 MHz
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 37.8 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 1152 vs 336
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 907.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 23% lower typical power consumption: 130 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1536 MB vs 768 MB
- Around 56% higher memory clock speed: 5600 MHz vs 3600 MHz
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11808 vs 7745
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 vs 12 July 2010 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 675 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 37.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 336 |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 1536 MB vs 768 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz vs 3600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 vs 7745 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3356 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11808 | 7745 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 | 0 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2264 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 617.847 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.823 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.222 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 40.61 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3351 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF104 |
Launch date | 27 June 2013 | 12 July 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 940 | 943 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $89.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 34.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 675 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops | 907.2 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1152 | 336 |
Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s | 37.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 8.25"(210 mm) (21 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 6-pin & 6-pin |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376"(111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 134.4 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
SLI |