NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1536 MB
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 vs 27 June 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1536 MB |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 85.25 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s
- Around 80% higher pipelines: 1152 vs 640
- Around 77% better floating-point performance: 2,046 gflops vs 1,155 gflops
- Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11290 vs 9777
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3685
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3685
- Around 36% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1333 vs 979
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 85.25 GTexel / s vs 36.08 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 640 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,046 gflops vs 1,155 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11290 vs 9777 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3685 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1333 vs 979 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2506 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9777 | 11290 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 1333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 12 March 2014 | 27 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 930 | 931 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,155 gflops | 2,046 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1152 |
| Texture fill rate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 85.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Boost clock speed | 888 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 823 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1536 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB / s | 134.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 295
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 460
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R7 M370
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M330
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 10 Mobile
