NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 vs 18.437
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 vs 427.88
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 vs 1.897
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 vs 23.742
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 126.579 vs 61.965
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 vs 3798
• Around 84% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 vs 3651
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 5% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 32.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 117
• 33.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 108.2
• 27.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3321 vs 119.7

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33.184 18.437
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1002.196 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.261 1.897
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.752 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	126.579 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6912 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6710 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6703 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	117 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	108.2 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	119.7 3321

Compare specifications (specs)