NVIDIA P106-090 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA P106-090 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 76% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 771 MHz
• Around 92% higher boost clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 797 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 63% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 122 Watt
• Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.225 vs 33.184
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1309.517 vs 1002.196
• Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 183.725 vs 126.579
• Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.178 vs 3.261
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.651 vs 54.752

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

• Around 39% higher texture fill rate: 102.0 GTexel / s vs 73.49 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
• Around 4% better floating-point performance: 2,448 gflops vs 2,352 gflops
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA P106-090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	86.225 33.184
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1309.517 1002.196
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	183.725 126.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6.178 3.261
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.651 54.752

Compare specifications (specs)