NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 78% higher core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 576 MHz
- Around 55% higher texture fill rate: 57.02 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
- 5.3x better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 155 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
- 7.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 900 MHz
Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 8 November 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 576 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 57.02 GTexel / s vs 36.8 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 768 vs 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops vs 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 155 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 768 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 579 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 92 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM206 | G80 |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 8 November 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1291 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 576 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 128 |
Texture fill rate | 57.02 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 155 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 681 million |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 270 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
SLI | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 |