NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies, API support. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 2x 128
- 2.4x better floating-point performance: 1,825 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 197 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB
- 6.6x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Launch date | 1 March 2016 vs 18 March 2008 |
Pipelines | 768 vs 2x 128 |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 197 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 2x 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
- Around 46% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.02 GTexel / s
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 76.8 billion / sec vs 57.02 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 613 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 262 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3238 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3238 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 LP | NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GM206 | G92 |
Launch date | 1 March 2016 | 18 March 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | $599 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 887 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1188 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1024 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | 2x 384.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2x 128 |
Texture fill rate | 57.02 GTexel / s | 76.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 197 Watt |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 256 (128 per GPU) | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI |
Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 202 mm | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
SLI options | Quad | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2x 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 105.8 GB / s | 128 (64 per GPU) |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
3D Vision | ||
SLI | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 |