NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2.8x more core clock speed: 924 MHz vs 325 MHz
- 46.8x more texture fill rate: 60.8 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 7.7x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 650 MHz
Launch date | 1 January 2016 vs 6 March 2003 |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz vs 325 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 138 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Rankine |
Code name | GM206 | NV34 A2 |
Launch date | 1 January 2016 | 6 March 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1175 | 1172 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 950 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 924 MHz | 325 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,946 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Texture fill rate | 60.8 GTexel / s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 45 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
Length | 171 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.5 (2.1) |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 10.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 650 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |